the Court rejected a Microsoft (China) Zheng request code patents declared invalid claims. Previously, Microsoft had asked the department to determine property rights Zheng code patent is invalid. Court finds that a key patent Zheng effective.
One patent refers to the illegal use of Microsoft
Microsoft's lawsuit stems from 1994 when it entered the Chinese market. At that time, Microsoft is trying to find a Chinese character input method accession to the Windows system, in the final Windows3.2 use Windows95 and Zheng Code input method and font easily.
Cheng Cheng-long patent code last year to a hospital in the prosecution of Microsoft, said Microsoft does not authorize the release of Windows95 after the use of Zheng Code input method. Long Zheng asked Microsoft to stop production and sales related to Windows98, Windows2000, WindowsXP eight versions of the operating system software.
After being sued Microsoft to the State Intellectual Property Office of the Committee to review the patent application, requests to determine Code Zheng input method patent is invalid, but was rejected by the patent review committee. Microsoft's patent review committee will hence in a hospital.
Zhizhengmawu of Microsoft creativity
Microsoft to withdraw Zheng yards on the ground that the patent Zheng Code input method does not have the novelty and creativity. Microsoft believes that Zheng code in the main patent technology "digital code" and a matter of public knowledge at the time of the "ID" is one thing. Microsoft also believes that Zheng's code coding technology has been available publicly.
Zheng found in a house with a new code input method, because Zheng Code input method patents and other root in the encoding on the fundamental differences exist, the Chinese character input method has obvious difference. One Intermediate People's Court also found that Zheng Code input method has the creativity, as a result of Zheng and other input method in the code and enter the access code on the steps there is an obvious difference. There were no above-mentioned decision.
After the announcement, Microsoft expressed disappointment at the agent. He said that the court should support the Microsoft. As for whether or not Microsoft's appeal, he said that Microsoft needs and after consultation with the decision.
The defendant patent review committee and the Long Cheng expressed satisfaction with the results. Mr Long said that the decision of the Chinese people to safeguard intellectual property rights.
One patent refers to the illegal use of Microsoft
Microsoft's lawsuit stems from 1994 when it entered the Chinese market. At that time, Microsoft is trying to find a Chinese character input method accession to the Windows system, in the final Windows3.2 use Windows95 and Zheng Code input method and font easily.
Cheng Cheng-long patent code last year to a hospital in the prosecution of Microsoft, said Microsoft does not authorize the release of Windows95 after the use of Zheng Code input method. Long Zheng asked Microsoft to stop production and sales related to Windows98, Windows2000, WindowsXP eight versions of the operating system software.
After being sued Microsoft to the State Intellectual Property Office of the Committee to review the patent application, requests to determine Code Zheng input method patent is invalid, but was rejected by the patent review committee. Microsoft's patent review committee will hence in a hospital.
Zhizhengmawu of Microsoft creativity
Microsoft to withdraw Zheng yards on the ground that the patent Zheng Code input method does not have the novelty and creativity. Microsoft believes that Zheng code in the main patent technology "digital code" and a matter of public knowledge at the time of the "ID" is one thing. Microsoft also believes that Zheng's code coding technology has been available publicly.
Zheng found in a house with a new code input method, because Zheng Code input method patents and other root in the encoding on the fundamental differences exist, the Chinese character input method has obvious difference. One Intermediate People's Court also found that Zheng Code input method has the creativity, as a result of Zheng and other input method in the code and enter the access code on the steps there is an obvious difference. There were no above-mentioned decision.
After the announcement, Microsoft expressed disappointment at the agent. He said that the court should support the Microsoft. As for whether or not Microsoft's appeal, he said that Microsoft needs and after consultation with the decision.
The defendant patent review committee and the Long Cheng expressed satisfaction with the results. Mr Long said that the decision of the Chinese people to safeguard intellectual property rights.
No comments:
Post a Comment